Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Background and Objective: The volume of patient portal messages has grown substantially and artificial intelligence (AI) can support clinical staff and improve the timeliness of patient care. Our objective is to test if an AI tool for managing the electronic inbox In-Basket reduces response times to patient portal messages in neurology. Methods: We conducted an implementation study from January to May 2026 in the neurology department at two clinical sites within a regional medical system. A single AI tool was implemented to auto-categorize and auto-route all patient messages received in the electronic inbox. The tool also generates optional draft replies to messages. Primary process measures were the median weekly time (hours) from message creation to the first action and to closure. Impact was analyzed using a controlled interrupted time-series (ITS) design, comparing message-volume-matched control divisions. Results: Among 24,142 messages analyzed, pre-intervention median weekly time to first action was 11.3 hours [IQR: 5.6, 15.1] (Site A) and 16.1 hours [IQR: 13.8, 19.0] (Site B), falling post-intervention to 1.0 hour [IQR: 0, 3.1] (Site A) and 0.6 hours [IQR: 0.2, 2.4] (Site B). Controlled interrupted time-series analysis showed a significant immediate differential level change in median weekly hours to first action at Site A (-92.5%, 95% CI: -97.5% to -78.0%), and a significant downward trend at Site B (-43.5%, 95% CI: -65.2% to -8.2%). Changes in time to closure were directionally favorable but not statistically significant at either site. There was low use of the generated draft replies, only 0.5% at Site A and 3% at Site B. Discussion: Implementation of AI-assisted message categorization and routing was associated with a substantially reduced initial action time for patient In-Basket messages in Epilepsy. The utilization of AI-generated draft-replies to messages was low. These findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of AI-augmented workflows to improve inbox management.

Background: Conventional performance metrics do not indicate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-platforms and radiologists are right or wrong on the same examinations, nor whether their non-agreement is more often beneficial or harmful. Objective: To develop, illustrate, and apply directional metrics quantifying non-agreement between radiologists and AI-platforms against a common reference standard, and to adapt a fragility-based framework for quantifying the statistical robustness of these metrics. Methods: We defined Positive Non-Agreement (PNA, AI-platform correct, radiologist incorrect), Negative Non-Agreement (NNA, radiologist correct, AI-platform incorrect), and Net Non-Agreement (NENA, their difference). Metrics were illustrated in three hypothetical scenarios of 1,000 examinations each and applied to three previously published AI-radiologist studies on pulmonary embolism and mammography. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated, and a reclassification fragility index (FI) quantified the minimum case reclassification needed to remove statistical support for NENA's direction. Results: In illustration, NENA was positive in two scenarios and negative in one. In the three published studies, NENA ranged from -4.18% to +10.74% and decreased consistently with increasing radiologist experience (junior residents, +6.27%; consultants, +1.45%), a gradient driven primarily by declining PNA with modest increase in NNA. The reclassification FI was defined for all three illustrative scenarios (range, 0.10%-1.70%) and for six of the seven comparisons from these studies (range, 0.34%-4.31%), but not for the weakest comparison, whose confidence interval for NENA included zero. Conclusions: PNA, NNA, and NENA provide a directional, case-level complement to conventional performance metrics for AI-radiologist non-agreement. The accompanying reclassification FI offers a statistically grounded, generalizable method for quantifying their robustness.

Objective A diversity of approaches and cohorts have been published in research literature for suicide risk estimation, leading to some uncertainty around which factors and conditions are most strongly contributing to risk. Methods exist for weighting estimates by propensity score, removing simplifying the interpretation of model effects. Few studies have explored the use of these tools to assess when the effect of certain factors is uncertain or inconsistent. Method A mix of 1,001,737 suicide decedents and living patients were evaluated for suicide risk, relying on a subset of commonly identified factors: demographics, psychiatric conditions, substance use disorders, and social needs. Care utilization patterns were then assessed controlling for these factors in a hospital care setting. Four methods were considered for controlling multivariate confounding of odds predicting death by suicide: multivariate logistic regression, 1-to-1 sample matching, inverse propensity weighting (IPTW), and entropy balancing (EBAL). Results Test statistics showed suicide decedents were much more likely to have various psychiatric and substance use diagnoses, social needs and more likely to heightened care utilization across sampling intervals. Greater utilization was found close to date of death. Effect sizes after IPTW and EBAL weighting were also generally greater than would have been documented by regression alone. Conclusions Propensity weighting is a useful alternative to exploring nuanced effects, especially when the direction and strength of an association differ from traditional statistics. By weighting, the overall imbalance of cases remains consistent and effect terms might reflect more nuanced associations than regression or sample matching alone.

Longitudinal clinical cohorts contain heterogeneous progression patterns that are obscured by coarse diagnostic labels. Discovering these latent progression phenotypes requires models that distinguish patients not only by their outcomes, but also by how their clinical trajectories evolve. This paper proposes TRACE, an interpretable temporal phenotyping method that enables the learning of outcome-informed progression phenotypes from longitudinal trajectories. TRACE combines a trajectory- and outcome-aware contrastive objective with a probabilistic predictive phenotype layer, encouraging phenotypes to capture progression structure while remaining predictive of diagnostic state. A dual-attention mechanism further supports interpretation by identifying the visits and clinical variables most associated with each phenotype assignment. TRACE is evaluated on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort for cognitive disease modeling, showing improved performance in both diagnostic prediction and phenotype discovery compared with other temporal phenotyping baselines. Finally, by allowing the number of phenotypes to exceed the diagnostic labels, TRACE enables discovering additional progression patterns that are not captured by labels defined a priori.

Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability in Uganda, with a prevalence of approximately 2.5% and a 25-30% 30-day mortality rate, exacerbated by limited access to predictive tools and advanced diagnostics. Machine learning (ML) offers potential for early stroke risk stratification, but its application in resource-constrained settings like Uganda requires tailored models and rigorous performance evaluation, as well as assessment of misclassification patterns. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an ML-based predictive model for stroke using clinical and socio-demographic characteristics among patients at Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH) and residents of Wakiso District, Uganda, identify key predictors and assess misclassification patterns to enhance targeted prevention. A retrospective case-control study utilized secondary data from 1,016 participants (254 stroke cases, 762 controls) across three prior studies conducted between 2006 and 2015. Eight ML algorithms were evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, with performance metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, F1-score, and area under receiver operator characteristics curve (AU-ROC). McNemars test compared model classification performance of the top 2 models. Feature importance identified key predictors, and misclassification patterns were analyzed using classification matrix and line graphs. The Random Forest (RF) model achieved the highest performance (95.18% accuracy, 90.10% F1-score, 97% AU-ROC). McNemars test confirmed RFs superior classification (p=0.01). Age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and waist-hip ratio were the top drivers of RF stroke predictions. RF misclassified 8.3% of stroke cases and 3.3% of non-stroke cases, due to overlaps in risk profiles (e.g., lower cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and age in false negatives). The RF model demonstrates strong potential for stroke risk prediction in Uganda, leveraging routine data to prioritize high-risk individuals. Misclassification analysis highlights areas for model refinement, supporting its potential for integration into clinical workflows for early intervention and stroke prevention in resource-limited settings. Future external validation across diverse populations is recommended.

INTRODUCTION: The digital clock drawing test (dCDT) is a cognitive screening tool capturing high-resolution pen-movement data. Existing approaches for classifying cognitive impairment from dCDTs rely on selected features or image-based methods. We propose representing dCDTs as structural networks to classify cognitive impairment and characterize spatial organization in clock drawings. METHODS: Weighted networks were constructed from 3,362 Framingham Heart Study participants, with and without cognitive impairment. Network representations were generated separately for command and copy conditions, with nodes representing pre-defined clock components (digits, hands, clock face) and edges capturing pairwise spatial relationships between components. Random forest models and graph convolutional networks were trained to predict cognitive impairment from the networks. Models were benchmarked against demographics-only and established summary feature baselines. RESULTS: Network-based models achieved AUC values comparable to the established summary feature baseline across command-only and copy-only conditions. Differences in spatial organization between the cognitively intact and impaired groups were greatest in the upper-right clock region, involving digits 1 and 2, the clock hands, and the surrounding clock face. Differences between the command and copy networks were larger among cognitively impaired participants. DISCUSSION: The proposed network representations provide an objective, scalable, and flexible framework for representing clock drawings for use in classification models. dCDT networks matched the predictive performance of established summary feature-based approaches and identified clock regions where spatial organization differed by cognitive status. After external validation, this approach has the potential to be incorporated within a clinical workflow to support automated and interpretable cognitive screening.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated for clinical tasks, but safe use requires reliable uncertainty estimates as well as high accuracy. We tested eight general-purpose LLMs on 100 validated neurology board-style multiple-choice questions and compared three confidence signals: self-reported confidence, critique-implied confidence from an independent model instance, and consistency-based confidence from repeated sampling. Accuracy varied from 45% (Llama 3.1 8B) to 92% (Gemini 3 Flash/Pro), but confidence was generally overestimated, particularly in lower-accuracy models. Consistency-based confidence provided the best discrimination between correct and incorrect answers (pooled AUROC 0.74), outperforming self-report, although calibration differences between methods were not significant. Calibration should therefore be reported alongside accuracy when clinical LLMs are evaluated.

Awareness of comorbidities in people with dementia is vital context for dementia research and clinical management. Natural Language Processing (NLP) applied to free text in the electronic health record (EHR) may help ascertain comorbidity presence. Our aim was to assess the validity of the MedCAT Comorbidity NLP app in a cohort of people with dementia. We used text from the EHR of South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Trust via Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS), linked to structured data from local primary care (Lambeth DataNet) and hospital admission data in a cohort of 3,543 people with dementia. We evaluated MedCAT Comorbidity, examining internal validity via manual review of text and external validity by cross-validation against linked primary care and hospital data; and comparison of the predictive value of comorbidity measures for mortality. Internal precision was highest for atrial fibrillation (100%) and lowest for diabetes (78%). Cross-validation with linked data varied substantially across conditions, with precision from 96% to 59% and recall 77% to 4%. The median number of comorbidities identified was two using any single source, or three when combined. MedCAT Comorbidity demonstrated predictive ability for mortality (HR 1.11 per condition), although the model fit was better using comorbidity from hospital admission data. In people with dementia, the MedCAT Comorbidity app showed high precision for most conditions during internal validation. The variability of precision and recall on external validity assessment partly reflects incomplete documentation. Results from the MedCAT comorbidity app can assist researchers in understanding comorbidity of cohorts, particularly when primary care or hospital data is not available. Our findings highlight the need to develop quality assurance protocols that include internal and external validity checks before deploying general data extraction apps for specific clinical subpopulations.

Background: Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) built on simulation models are usually delivered through project-specific scripts. Each new model, and often each new question, rebuilds the same scaffolding: parameter management, calibration, base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis and export. This is costly, and is where traceability between an estimate and the model version producing it is lost. We present THALASSA, a web application providing this infrastructure once, for any model satisfying a small programming contract. Methods: A simulation model is connected by one file implementing a fixed contract of R functions that determine its behaviour. THALASSA exposes the complete CEA workflow in a browser: a generated overview of the connected model, parameter editing, calibration, base-case comparison with the efficiency curve, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a willingness-to-pay threshold, each with timestamped file export carrying the parameter values it was run with. Every session is bound to a repository version, so results carry their generating model version. Results: We demonstrate THALASSA on two public models of contrasting difficulty: a simple tutorial model and a generic cancer screening model with two competing natural-history pathways and a 21-dimensional calibration deliberately built to be more complex. Both ran on the same unmodified setup, implementing the same contract, with no code changes. Conclusions: Separating analysis infrastructure from model logic makes the CEA workflow reusable across projects and reproducible by construction. A modelling team can move from a versioned repository to audit-ready, exportable CEA outputs without writing analysis code. The integration effort does not grow with model size and one installation serves unrelated projects.

The aim of this study was to develop a framework for assessing the incremental value of decisions on drug amount, timing, input structure, cessation and restart. The LOGOS (Longitudinal Optimization of Global Outcomes and Strategies) approach combines matched nested regimen classes, mechanism-specific benchmarks and evidence requirements in a single longitudinal comparison. Thus, the contribution of additional regimen freedom is assessed separately from improvements due to different resources, constraints or evaluation horizons. Nested feasible classes have nondecreasing objective suprema, whereas a strict gain requires a feasible witness above a valid bound for the smaller class. The approach is illustrated through analytical examples of periodic smoothing, matched desensitization, relaxed exposure allocation, finite-course loading and safety after cessation. In a normalized finite Emax model, integrated benefit increased from 0.629606 for three equal boluses to 0.672945 after optimization of amounts, 0.677043 for an amount-and-time candidate and 0.679553 for a globally certified loading-maintenance-coast solution. The adjacent observed gains were 6.88%, 0.61% and 0.37%, respectively, and all schedules satisfied the full-tail injury bound. In addition, a periodic factorial example separated response curvature from a joint recovery and repair process, including a null case and results dependent on feasibility constraints. The LOGOS framework allows assessment of whether additional regimen flexibility improves benefit, provides no added value or restores feasibility. These dimensionless examples support conditional mathematical and model-based conclusions; clinical superiority and safe restart in patients have not been established.

Personalized medicine aims to tailor treatments to individual patients, but its implementation is limited by scarce clinical resources and heterogeneous treatment effects. Electronic health records now offer longitudinal data that can support data-driven therapy selection. We focus on SGLT2 inhibitors, medications with broad metabolic and cardiovascular benefits, whose clinical impact varies significantly based on individual patient profiles. We propose a counterfactual Structural Causal Model (SCM) to estimate individual treatment effects (ITE) of SGLT2 inhibitors from observational data. The model assumes counterfactual stability and uses a Gumbel-Max sampling mechanism to capture stochastic treatment assignment while enabling differentiable inference. Optimal treatments are defined by maximizing the counterfactual value of future diagnostic outcomes. We evaluate the Counterfactual Gumbel-Max SCM using a doubly robust value estimator and show that, across diagnostic categories, it outperforms real-world prescriptions in predicted treatment value, highlighting subpopulations where SGLT2 inhibitors yield superior outcomes. By integrating causal inference with electronic health data, this framework provides individualized counterfactual reasoning about SGLT2 treatment effects and can support clinicians in identifying optimal therapies for type 2 diabetes and comorbid conditions.

BACKGROUND Timely cause-of-death (COD) information guides health policy, yet many deaths in low- and middle-income countries are not medically certified. In Africa, fewer than 10% of deaths are. Verbal autopsy (VA) yields a structured symptom questionnaire and a free-text narrative. Mortality surveillance increasingly records the narrative alongside the questionnaire, but the algorithms used to produce VA-based statistics were designed for structured responses only, so narratives inform physician COD assignment but do not contribute to algorithmic COD assignment. We evaluated whether supervised models could use both modalities to improve COD assignment. METHODS We analyzed 4,999 VA records for deaths at ages 12 years or older from a national sample of registered deaths in South Africa (RSA), using physician-assigned CODs as the reference standard. We trained unimodal and multimodal pipelines on the labelled records: pretrained language models (PLMs) fine-tuned on narratives alone, machine learning (ML) models on structured responses alone, and the two combined at the data, feature, and decision levels. We also prompted a locally deployed generative large language model (LLM) on the same unimodal and multimodal inputs, without parameter updates. All were compared with InSilicoVA, the operational comparator representing current automated practice. We evaluated individual-level assignment, population-level agreement, calibration, and generalization across provinces in RSA, reporting these metrics rather than ranking pipelines on any one of them. RESULTS Every supervised pipeline improved on InSilicoVA by 8.5-15.9 percentage points in top-1 accuracy and 3.5-7.1 points in cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy. The narrative and structured pipelines performed similarly in aggregate but differed by cause: 63.9% of deaths received identical predictions, 11.6% were correct only from the narrative pipeline, and 13.6% only from the questionnaire pipeline, with the narrative pipeline more accurate for noncommunicable causes and the questionnaire pipeline for communicable causes. Against the unimodal approaches, the decision-fusion pipelines added 4.2-5.4 percentage points in top-1 accuracy, concentrated in the most common causes, whereas feature fusion with cross-modal attention improved the less common causes, adding 6.6 points (95% CI, 1.7-11.5) in balanced accuracy and 5.5 points (95% CI, 0.6-10.3) in macro F1. Feature fusion reached the highest CSMF accuracy (95.7%). Paired differences from the better unimodal representative ranged from -0.2 to +3.4 points, with all intervals including zero. The LLM exceeded InSilicoVA on individual-level metrics and reached the highest balanced accuracy of any pipeline (60.6%), while the supervised pipelines retained higher CSMF accuracy. Supervised pipelines had lower expected calibration error than InSilicoVA. Supervised gains held across all nine held-out provinces, including every top-1 comparison and nearly every macro F1 and CSMF comparison. CONCLUSIONS PLMs using narratives alone substantially improved on current best practice and matched ML pipelines using structured responses, while multiple multimodal strategies produced further gains in individual COD assignment. The zero-shot LLM showed particular strength on rare causes, whereas supervised pipelines better recovered the population cause distribution. These findings support incorporating narratives as a core input to automated VA systems and evaluating representative fusion strategies for the intended output. External validation across settings and age groups will support broader implementation.

Background: Conventional discrimination metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), do not characterize the composition of outcomes among patients flagged as high risk by clinical prediction models. This limitation is particularly relevant in critical care, where competing deaths and incomplete follow-up can complicate the interpretation of prediction alerts. We developed the Balanced Risk Integrity Index (BRII), a stratum-level metric defined as the proportion of target events among target events, competing deaths, and early-censored observations in a flagged high-risk stratum. BRII is algebraically related to positive predictive value (PPV) and is reported alongside its component decomposition to characterize the outcome composition of flagged patients. Methods: We evaluated BRII using seven acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction models developed in MIMIC-IV and externally validated in MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD (116,010 patients in total). Additional simulations examined the effects of competing deaths and early censoring on BRII and conventional model performance metrics. Results: For 48-hour AKI prediction in the top 10% risk stratum, BRII ranged from 0.90 to 0.96 in MIMIC-III, compared with less than 0.26 across all models in eICU-CRD, where 61.5% of evaluated patients were censored before the prediction horizon. In the eICU-CRD top 10% strata for the same target, 37.0% to 50.2% of patients were censored early, 12.2% to 15.5% had AKI, and 3.4% to 8.1% died before AKI. BRII and PPV ordered at least one model pair differently in 34 of 48 cohort-outcome-top-k groups. Under simulated random censoring for 48-hour AKI prediction, BRII declined by up to 0.80 while binary-label AUROC changed by less than 0.02. Conclusions: BRII provided complementary information on high-risk stratum composition, yielding different model rankings from PPV and revealing substantial differences across external validation cohorts. Interpreted alongside PPV and its component decomposition, BRII offers a standardized approach to evaluating clinical prediction alerts across models and observation environments.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the extent to which educational attainment, Alzheimer's disease (AD) knowledge, and research attitudes are associated with willingness to participate in AD research, and whether AD knowledge and research attitudes mediate associations between educational attainment and willingness to participate. METHODS: 201 older adults completed self-report measures of AD knowledge, research attitudes, prior research participation, and willingness to participate in diagnostic procedures (neuropsychological assessment, blood draw, brain MRI) and non-pharmacological intervention research (tracking physical activity, aerobic exercise). RESULTS: Favorable research attitudes were consistently associated with greater willingness to participate across all proposed research activities, and research attitudes mediated the relationship between educational attainment and willingness to participate in research. In contrast, AD knowledge did not mediate the association between educational attainment and willingness to participate. DISCUSSION: Research attitudes may be a key, modifiable determinant of willingness to participate in AD research and a promising focus for broadening AD research participation.

The -Bonacci weighted sequence space {ell}(,) is introduced for [&ge;] 2, 1 [&le;] < {infty}, and > 0). It is proved to be a Banach space which is isometrically isomorphic to {ell}, with an unconditional Schauder basis. The space is also reflexive and uniformly convex. Its strict inclusion chain, continuous dual, and asymptotic truncation estimate of order - / are also established. Based on this framework, Scaled &#119898-BonacciNet is proposed as a lightweight CNN that rescales Fibonacci-Net channels using the dominant &#119898-Bonacci root and employs depth wise separable convolutions. Tribonacci-Net achieved 96.09% accuracy and a 0.9581 macro F1-score on the 15-class Brain MRI dataset using 0.85 million parameters and 0.366 GFLOPs. Pentanacci-Net attained 95.87% accuracy on the 44-class dataset while reducing parameters and FLOPs by 47.10% and 44.48%, respectively. On the CKD ultrasound dataset, Hexanacci-Net achieved 83.75% accuracy and a 0.7941 macro F1-score, with corresponding reductions of 50.37% and 45.10%. These findings support dominant-root scaling as a structured approach to lightweight CNN design.

Computed tomography (CT) interpretation requires recognition of the anatomical level of each slice. Classification may facilitate preprocessing and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. We developed deep learning models to classify craniofacial CT slices into six anatomical categories. A total of 11,769 images were collected from a multicenter database involving 10 Japanese university hospitals and the public Head-Neck-Radiomics-HN1 dataset. Patients were divided into training (70%) and evaluation (30%) sets. Five CNN architectures were trained from scratch, and hard- and soft-voting ensembles were evaluated. Individual-model accuracy ranged from 94.72% to 96.09%; the hard-voting ensemble achieved 96.46% accuracy (Cohen's k = 0.954). Although performance differed among individual models (Cochran's Q = 99.29, p < 0.001), the ensemble did not significantly outperform EfficientNetV2B1 (McNemar's p = 0.163). Errors occurred mainly between adjacent anatomical regions. Deep learning can classify craniofacial CT slices accurately and may support automated dataset organization and AI-assisted fracture diagnosis. External validation is needed.

Purpose: To evaluate whether visually assessed high-quality prostate MRI, as defined by the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system, is sufficient to ensure consistent AI model performance, or whether hidden acquisition-related technical effects introduce variability that cannot be detected through visual inspection. Methods: This retrospective study included 568 bpMRI scans from seven institutions, classified using PI-QUAL v2 into high-quality (scores 2-3) and low-quality (score 1) groups. Quantitative image quality features were extracted using MRQy from T2w and ADC sequences. Three experiments were conducted on high-quality scans: (1) unsupervised clustering to identify hidden technical batch effects; (2) V-Net models (M) for prostate capsule segmentation on T2w using single-cluster and balanced multi-cluster training strategies; and (3) VoxelMorph-based deformable registration (M2) to align ADC maps to T2w images. Performance metrics included DSC, precision, recall, volume ratio, HD95, ASSD, and TRE. Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed cross-cluster variability, Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) evaluated performance equivalence, and bootstrap resampling quantified training efficiency. Results: Clustering identified four clusters among 277 high-quality bpMRI scans. Single-cluster models showed variable performance (DSC=0.41-0.85) with significant batch effects (p<0.001), even with 140 training samples. The balanced multi-cluster model (n=60) eliminated batch effects (p=0.075), achieved equivalent performance (p<0.001), and demonstrated 2.23-fold greater training efficiency despite using 2.3-fold fewer samples. Registration performance also varied significantly across clusters (TRE=0.86-5.47 mm, p<0.001). Conclusion: Acquisition-related batch effects significantly impact AI generalizability in prostate MRI, even among high-quality scans. Quantitative clustering enables detection of technical variations and supports diversity-aware training strategies that achieve equivalent performance with 2.3-fold fewer samples while eliminating batch effects.

Purpose To evaluate the external transportability of source-derived probability calibration for chest radiograph deep learning classifiers under distribution shift and determine its dependence on sample size and disease prevalence. Materials and Methods This retrospective secondary computational analysis of public, de-identified radiographic datasets involved no participant contact or new data collection. Cohort sizes were prespecified by availability without prospective power calculation: 106,686 NIH ChestX-ray14 images (29,323 patients; 1992-2015) for development and internal testing, 20,000 CheXpert images (20,000 patients; October 2002-July 2017), and 14,998 VinBigData images (2018-2020) for external testing. ResNet-18, DenseNet-121, and DeiT-Tiny classifiers for cardiomegaly and pleural effusion were trained across four patient fractions and three seeds (36 fits). Calibrators were fitted exclusively on NIH data. Twelve primary external Brier-score contrasts (temperature-scaled versus raw probabilities) were evaluated using paired cluster-bootstrapping with Holm adjustment. Results Temperature scaling reduced Brier scores in nine of 12 primary contrasts but worsened pleural effusion calibration on VinBigData across all architectures (Brier increases: ResNet-18, 0.001460 [95% CI: 0.001347, 0.001568]; DenseNet-121, 0.001193 [95% CI: 0.001109, 0.001274]; DeiT-Tiny, 0.000498 [95% CI: 0.000417, 0.000577]; all adjusted P=.006). Standardizing class weights to NIH prevalence reversed all CheXpert improvements. Although full versus 10% training improved external AUROC across all comparisons, DeiT-Tiny CheXpert pleural effusion Brier score worsened by 0.007039 despite a 0.032466 AUROC gain. At 80% selective image retention, calibrated ensembles retained only 12.3%-17.2% of VinBigData positive pleural effusion examinations. Conclusion Source-fitted calibration is not uniformly transportable across health systems, and discrimination gains do not guarantee calibrated probabilities. External evaluation must simultaneously assess probability reliability, prevalence shifts, and retained-case composition.

OBJECTIVE: Research on neighborhood context and cognitive health often relies on composite indices that collapse neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and aspects of the built environment into a single score. This study examined the extent to which neighborhood SES and built environment were associated with late-life cognitive impairment. METHOD: Participants were 281 predominantly Black older adults who completed the Self-Administered Gerocognitive Exam (SAGE), a brief cognitive screening measure. Participants also provided their home address to obtain four neighborhood metrics: Two composite measures of neighborhood disadvantage, the Environmental Justice Index (EJI) and the EJI Social-Environmental Rank, as well as the EJI Social Vulnerability Rank as a measure of neighborhood SES, and the EJI Environmental Burden Rank to measure exposure to hazardous aspects of the built environment. RESULTS: Lower neighborhood SES was associated with higher odds of cognitive impairment. In contrast, greater environmental burden was associated with lower odds of impairment, with years of education as a moderator; the association was strongest among individuals with high levels of education. The two composite scores were not associated with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Composite measures of neighborhood features may obscure distinct pathways of their effects on cognition.

Neurologic autoantibody cell-based assay images are difficult to interpret when fluorescence is weak, focal or dominated by background signal. We developed a visual artificial intelligence overlay that transfers detected cell boundaries from the structural channel to the antibody-staining image and evaluated standalone model concordance and its association with reader classifications. The analysis used 2 763 records for model development and 499 held-out records spanning 14 antibody targets. Four readers assessed the held-out records first without assistance and then with the boundary overlay and model category available. The selected model agreed with the reader-derived three-class reference in 85.2% of records, but recall was lowest for weak-positive or equivocal records. Reader agreement increased in the assisted session, and almost all revised ratings moved towards the model category. The combined display may support consistent visual review while also creating a risk of model-directed anchoring; its role as a second-read aid requires independent validation.